Skip to content
Resources Tools About Contact

Contractor RAMS Review Form

A contractor RAMS review form records the workplace’s review of a contractor’s risk assessment and method statement (RAMS) before work is allowed to proceed. This page explains in general educational terms what the form is for and what it typically contains. It is a simplified template example, not an official document and not legal advice.

An educational library of workplace documents — purpose, who completes them, when they are used, typical fields, common mistakes and how they connect. Linked to workplace safety, workplace training, occupations, industries and employment documents. Informational only — template examples, not legal advice or official documents; employers remain responsible and using a document does not guarantee compliance.

What a contractor RAMS review form is

A contractor RAMS review form is used to record that a contractor’s risk assessment and method statement have been reviewed by the host organisation, that they are suitable for the site and task, and that any gaps were resolved before work began.

This is an educational overview with a simplified example. It is not an official template, and reviewing RAMS does not make the contractor’s work compliant — the employer decides what an acceptable review looks like.

Purpose

  • Record that the contractor’s RAMS were reviewed before work.
  • Confirm the method and controls suit the actual site and task.
  • Capture any gaps raised and how they were resolved.
  • Provide a documented gate before the contractor proceeds.

Who completes it

  • A competent person the employer authorises to review RAMS.
  • With input from the site team who know the local hazards.
  • The contractor responds to any points raised.
  • It is the employer’s responsibility to ensure the reviewer is competent.

When it is used

  • Before a contractor starts work that needs a method statement.
  • When the method, scope or site conditions change.
  • After an incident that questions the method.
  • When re-engaging a contractor for similar work.

Typical fields

  • Contractor, task and the RAMS reference reviewed.
  • Reviewer name, role and date.
  • Checks: hazards covered, controls suitable, site-specific issues.
  • Gaps or queries raised and the contractor’s response.
  • Outcome: accepted, accepted with conditions, or returned.
  • Example fields only — adapt to your task, risk and the applicable law.

Common mistakes

  • Accepting RAMS without reading them against the actual site.
  • Treating a generic method statement as site-specific.
  • Not following up on gaps before work starts.
  • No record of who reviewed or what was agreed.

Document workflow

A RAMS review usually follows contractor approval and competency checks and comes before any permit handover and the start of work. Its findings may feed conditions into the approval and the site briefing, and an incident later may trigger a fresh review.

See the related documents below for what is commonly used with and completed after a contractor RAMS review.

Retention (high level)

RAMS reviews are usually kept with the contractor’s file and the reviewed RAMS for the duration of the work and a period afterwards, in line with the employer’s obligations.

This page does not state a required period — confirm with the applicable law and the official authority.

Completing and sharing as a PDF

RAMS reviews are commonly completed and stored as PDFs attached to the reviewed RAMS. Exporting to PDF supports the record; it does not make the RAMS or the review official or guarantee compliance.

Employer checklist

  • Ensure the reviewer is competent and understands the site.
  • Check the RAMS against the real task, not a template.
  • Resolve gaps before work starts, and record the outcome.
  • Keep the review with the RAMS and any conditions set.

Contractor notes

  • Provide RAMS that match the actual task and site.
  • Respond to review points before starting work.
  • Work to the agreed method, and flag if conditions change.

Country considerations

Most countries expect higher-risk work to be planned and controlled, but how method statements and risk assessments are expected to be prepared and reviewed differs, and the official authority differs. This page is general and high-level — not a statement of any country’s law and not a guarantee of validity.

Confirm current requirements with the official authority for your country and a qualified professional.

Who is responsible

The employer is responsible for ensuring contractors’ methods are suitable for the site and for compliance, and the contractor is responsible for the safe execution of their work. This page is an educational overview with a template example; it does not make any work compliant and does not transfer responsibility.

Export, edit and share documents

The documents, policies and templates this involves can be exported, edited, signed, stored and shared as PDFs with the HELPERG PDF Editor.

Free, printable HR & employment resources

Practical, ungated resources to put this into action — no signup.

For general informational and educational purposes only. This is documentation guidance — not legal advice and not a substitute for professional or legal guidance. Any fields, sections or checklists shown are simplified template examples only — not official, approved or jurisdiction-specific documents. Employers remain responsible for determining which documents are required, adapting them to their organisation and the applicable law, and for compliance; using a document does not guarantee legal or regulatory compliance and reading this page does not satisfy any legal obligation. Requirements vary by role, site and country and change over time — always follow the applicable law and the official authority, and confirm specifics with a qualified professional.
Across the platform

Explore the employment knowledge graph

Move between employment law, documents, occupations, hiring guides, career guides and country guides — all one connected graph.

Knowledge graph

Employment knowledge graph

The master map of every employment cluster.

Open
Employment law

Employment law by country

How employment law works, by jurisdiction.

Open
Documents

Employment documents

Contracts, letters and forms, explained.

Open
Occupations

Occupations encyclopedia

Roles, responsibilities, skills and hiring.

Open
Hiring guides

How to hire

Employer guides to hiring each kind of worker.

Open
Career guides

Career guides

Practical, evergreen guidance for candidates.

Open
Country guides

Working in…

How work and hiring function by country.

Open
For employers

For employers

How HRHelperG works for employers.

Open
Request workers

Request workers

Tell us what workers you need.

Open
Ecosystem

Business ecosystem

Recruitment partners, including TNT agency s.r.o.

Open
Candidates

Candidate registration

Register your interest — free, no obligation.

Open
Knowledge graph

HR knowledge graph

The master topical map of the platform.

Open
HR intelligence

HR intelligence center

The master knowledge graph of every cluster.

Open
Job descriptions

Job descriptions by role

Responsibilities, skills and templates.

Open
Interview questions

Interview questions by role

Behavioural and practical questions.

Open
Hiring process

Hiring process by role

The end-to-end hiring workflow per role.

Open
Templates

HR templates

Free, printable, placeholder-based templates.

Open
HR documents

HR documents center

Document guidance and structure.

Open
Country HR

Country HR

How HR works in different countries.

Open
Staffing

Staffing & recruitment agencies

When and how to use external recruiting help.

Open
Employers

Employer services

Request hiring support and partner matching.

Open

Practical HR resources, by email

Templates, hiring insights and workforce updates. No spam — unsubscribe anytime.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is this an official RAMS review form?

No. It is a simplified template example for educational purposes — not an official, approved or jurisdiction-specific document and not legal advice. Adapt it to your task, risk and the applicable law.

Does reviewing RAMS make the work compliant?

No. A review records that the method was checked; it does not by itself guarantee compliance or safe execution. Both host and contractor retain their respective responsibilities.

Who should review a contractor’s RAMS?

A competent person the employer authorises, with input from the site team. The employer decides who is competent to review.

What if the RAMS are generic?

Generic method statements often need to be made site-specific before work. The reviewer typically raises this and the contractor revises the RAMS before starting.