Assessment model
Assess your workforce capacity qualitatively against four levels of maturity. There is no score and no benchmark — the point is an honest read and a direction to improve in.
- Level 1 — Ad hoc: handled reactively and inconsistently, with little documentation or ownership.
- Level 2 — Developing: some structure exists, but it is uneven and depends on particular individuals.
- Level 3 — Defined: a consistent, documented approach with clear owners and basic measurement.
- Level 4 — Optimised: measured, regularly reviewed and continuously improved, and it informs decisions.
Evaluation criteria
Reflect on each criterion and place it against the four levels above.
- Demand is forecast in labour hours, not vague volumes.
- Capacity is based on productive, not just contracted, hours.
- Leave and absence are allowed for explicitly.
- Utilisation assumptions are realistic, below 100%.
- Capacity is compared against demand routinely.
- Contingency exists for peaks and surprises.
Common gaps
- Planning on contracted hours rather than productive ones.
- Ignoring leave and absence entirely.
- Assuming everyone is productively occupied 100% of the time.
- No clear view of demand versus capacity.
Improvement recommendations
- Forecast demand in labour hours.
- Base capacity on productive hours and realistic utilisation.
- Allow explicitly for leave and absence.
- Compare capacity to demand on a cadence.
- Plan contingency for peaks.
Need hiring support?
Tell us what roles you need to fill. We can help connect you with recruitment and staffing partners that match your hiring requirements — HR helper group is a matching platform, not a recruitment agency, and makes no placement guarantees.